How do you know when you’ve gotten what you’ve paid for? That’s the question we started pondering after finding out that many popular OnlyFans creators have hired people to imitate them and chat (on their behalf) with paying fans.⁠

Let’s back up for a second though:⁠

Only Fans (OF) is a subscription-based social media platform where anyone can create content and sell it to paying subscribers. Much of this content (photos and videos) is pornographic in nature. ⁠

Some OF customers shell out big bucks (often hundreds of dollars per session) for one-on-one chats with their favorite creators. But what these customers often don’t know is that they’re exchanging messages with a “professional chatter” – someone hired to imitate the creator – rather than the creator herself.

OF creators use professional chatters to maximize the number of fans they can interact with – and make money from – each month. And many creators feel it’s perfectly ethical because their OF persona is just a “character” they play anyway – it’s not really “them.”

But others feel it’s unethical. As one OF star put it, “After a while, it started to bother me. … The people working my accounts had developed intimate relationships with these fans, and I felt bad for the subscribers because it wasn’t me they were talking to.” ⁠

(Recently, OF added a small statement to their Terms of Service advising customers that they may be interacting with creators OR their teams.)⁠

Reading about professional OF chatters got us wondering …⁠

 ?  If their fans are dropping serious $$ to have one-on-one chats with them … Is it deceptive of OnlyFans creators to hire other people to handle these private chats? ⁠

 ?  If a professional chatter is extremely good at imitating an OF creator (there’s practically no difference in their conversational style) … Is it deceptive? Or is the customer actually getting what they paid for?⁠

 ?  When is deception ethical … and when is it not?⁠


See what our followers had to say about this topic.


Related Products  The Deep Game



  • Phsycodude12 said:

    Pretty sure the OF girl MIA rents from an agency and has people who chat for her. I chatted with her multiple times and it felt like a different person each time to where I thought it was an AI but this makes so much more sense. I have see the stuff about quotas and things too and a few times they have mentioned how it would really help them if I could buy this expensive video. I even mentioned how the messages felt off sometimes and they got really mad about my accusation. Seemed like the person I chatted with that time was a fan themselves and didn’t want her exposed.

    September 21, 2023

  • ARH said:

    Yeah, I recently subscribed (for free) to a chick whose site is run by an agency. She teams with two other girls with sites managed by the same agency. They are always available 24/7. It seems that I am talking to several different people. I know I am getting scammed, but if I unsubscribe then I will lose all the content that I have purchased.

    September 11, 2023

  • Got blue balled said:

    I am guilty of this too. Putri Cinta hooked me in. But like you all I realize I was being played. Always online, typical scripted material. She’s unbelievably captivating but I won’t give my money away like that.

    July 24, 2023

  • Fred Bassett said:

    Hypothetical:- If you bought tickets to see The Foo Fighters live in concert, but when you go to the show it is actually a Foo Fighters tribute band, you’ve been scammed!
    Sure, they may look like The Foo Fighters. They may even do a great job playing their catalogue of songs, but you paid to see the actual Foo Fighters.

    Same rule applies here. You pay to chat to the model, NOT an impersonator.
    This is actually a crime called “Financial gain via means of deception”, AKA:- Fraud!

    What I can’t understand is why the authorities haven’t shut OnlyFans down already.

    July 19, 2023

  • Antoine said:

    Even if you ask to provide a selfie with your name written on a piece of paper or a video saying your name, chatter can techno quickly ping the creator to do it, share the content, and chatter will continue interacting with you :)

    July 14, 2023

  • AK said:

    Extremely unethical. Nikkimagic, always available, never sends real time pics. Pushes, pushes.

    July 11, 2023

  • Sr said:

    I’ve offered up a $500 tip to many of them to post a selfie with my name on a piece of paper. They NEVER do it, because they can’t. However, if I purchase the pre-made content for $40 bucks they respond immediately. A fucking rip off.

    July 08, 2023

  • dboy said:

    Thanks for this post very informative, some of the DMs were well scripted and got mesmerize and dropped some serious $$$. Just discovered their real life profile and their OF persona just doesn’t match plus they spammed every social media platform. It’s 21st century cat fishing.

    July 07, 2023

  • C. Anderson said:

    Miss Viho account is run by a agency. I met the guy who runs her account and he told me she just scams all he subscribers. Stay away

    July 03, 2023

  • J1s said:

    Yeah. I figured this out over last few days. I noticed the creator was ALWAYS available to chat. Like they don’t sleep? Then it hit me. How do I know I’m ‘chatting’ with them? It loses something when you realize how it really works.

    June 27, 2023

  • Cherry Vince said:

    Thank you for this blog. this is a very useful and informative blog about onlyfan promotion.

    October 18, 2022

Leave a comment